It’s not always easy to answer questions like these, because it depends so much on your style of travel, your budget, what you want to see and how you want to see it. But it is possible to give you a rough idea of how much time you need in Peru: what you can and probably can’t do in any given amount of time.
Think of the following as a primer for planning your first trip to Peru. You won’t find detailed itineraries, but you will get a rough idea of how much you can see and do in Peru in (x) amount of days. Most of the following assumes you’ll be going to Machu Picchu, just because pretty much everyone does.
And as this is just an intro to the topic, feel free to ask questions about your itinerary in the comments section below.
How many days do you need in Peru anyways?
The number of days you should spend in Peru depends on your interests and the places you plan to visit. Typically a trip of 10 to 14 days is sufficient to explore attractions like Lima, Cusco, the Sacred Valley, and Machu Picchu. However, if you want to delve into Peru’s cultural heritage or experience the Amazon rainforest or even trek the famous Inca Trail, it would be wise to extend your stay. Whether you’re drawn to wonders, vibrant cities, or natural landscapes, giving yourself time will greatly enhance your understanding and enjoyment of this diverse and captivating country.
3 Days in Peru
Peru is a big place — about twice the size of Texas — so traveling around the country can take some time. For that reason, three days in Peru is rarely enough. Some package tours pull off these whirlwind trips, but they typically concentrate on one attraction — normally Machu Picchu.
Doing three days in Peru independently, you could fly into Lima and then fly directly to Cusco for Machu Picchu and then back to Lima. Or you could do the Nazca Lines and maybe see Arequipa. Or fly to Juliaca and then take the bus to Puno to explore Lake Titicaca for a day and a half. But you’ll be rushed, you won’t have time to relax, and it will probably all be a bit of a blur.
4 to 7 Days in Peru
Now you’re beginning to get some wriggle room. Four days is still incredibly tight, but with five to seven days in Peru you can do one or two destinations in reasonably relaxed fashion (especially with seven days), or really focus on one region or city.
Five days is enough for exploring Cusco and Machu Picchu. You won’t have much time for trekking, but you could maybe fit in a two-day trek to Machu Picchu. If you don’t trek, then you’ll have about two and a half days for Cusco and the Sacred Valley (let’s say four or five attractions, including Saksaywaman, Moray, Maras and Ollantaytambo) and a day and a half for Machu Picchu.
Alternatively, you could fly over the Nazca Lines, do Arequipa for a day (or two with Colca Canyon), then head to Cusco for Machu Picchu (with no time for seeing over stuff in or around Cusco). Or ditch Nazca or Arequipa for a day in Puno and Lake Titicaca instead.
If you can stretch to a week in Peru, then you can do the above — what is generally considered the classic Gringo Trail in Peru — at a slightly more relaxed pace. You’ll also have the option of taking a day to acclimatize to the altitude in Cusco before Machu Picchu (recommended). Arriving in Lima, you can head south to Nazca (or to Ica and Huacachina for sandboarding), then Arequipa, then possibly Lake Titicaca, finally arriving in Cusco for Machu Picchu.
It’s worth researching these destinations (and nearby alternatives) to figure out which interest you the most. You might find, for example, that you want to do just Arequipa (and Colca Canyon) and Cusco (Sacred Valley and Machu Picchu) in seven days, which is a more comfortable week-long itinerary in Peru.
Number of Days Spent in Peru by US Tourists in 2018:
- 1 to 3 days in Peru 11%
- 4 to 7 days in Peru 34%
- 8 to 14 days in Peru 39%
- 15 to 29 days in Peru 12%
- More than 29 days in Peru 4%
Statistics taken from Perfil del Turista Extranjero 2018, PromPerú
8 Days to 2 Weeks in Peru
Now we’re talking. If you can save up your vacation time to get 8 or 10 days or maybe even two weeks in Peru, then you’ll have enough time to do the classic Gringo Trail without having to rush the whole time.
Ten days would also be enough to see a couple of other destinations — the Nazca Lines and Arequipa, for example — and have time to hike the classic four day/three night Inca Trail or do a multiday alternative trek (most of the best Inca Trail operators offer classic and alternative routes). Or you could find some time to head into the Peruvian Amazon, perhaps into Manú National Park, which lies north of Cusco.
Two weeks would give you even more options, and is enough time to do pretty much all of the main attractions in the southern half of Peru (which is where the Gringo Trail lies). Or you can skip some of the more touristy destinations in the south and head to the far less visited northern half of Peru. You’ll probably have to fly back to Lima first, from where you can fly or bus along the north coast, to cities like Trujillo and Chiclayo with their Moche archaeological sites (and great food). There’s also Chachapoyas (for Kuelap and Gocta Waterfall), and the deep jungle city of Iquitos.
All are worth considering if you have two weeks in Peru, especially if you’d like to get off the tourist trail.
2 Weeks to a Month in Peru
Ah, the sweet taste of freedom! If you have more than two weeks in Peru, maybe even a month, then you have the luxury of choice when it comes to where you go and how long you stay in each place.
You could stay in one place and get to know it well, maybe volunteering or doing a homestay for part of the trip. Or you could do a couple of weeks on the Gringo Trail — seeing the Nazca Lines, Arequipa, Lake Titicaca, Cusco and Machu Picchu, maybe even the jungle in Manú National Park — and then head up to the central highlands and northern Peru for a week or more.
One place I’m not mentioning much here is Lima, where most foreign tourists first arrive. Some tourists hate Lima — but, to be honest, many of them don’t ever get to know it well enough to judge. But if you have three weeks or a month in Peru, then it’s worth sticking around in Lima for at least two or three days before heading elsewhere.
More Than a Month in Peru
Some people take a month or two to do all of South America, sometimes an entire world tour. If you’re that type of traveler — and there’s nothing wrong with that — then you might think a month in one country is excessive.
But if you want to know Peru well, then you’ll need at least a month. Peru is a country with three distinct geographic and cultural zones: the coast, the highlands, and the jungle. It’s kind of like visiting three different countries, each with differences in landscape, food and culture. Even the people change; for example, the more reserved but hard working highlanders are different from the more openly cheerful jungle Peruvians.
So if you think one or two or even three months in Peru is overkill, it might be worth thinking again. I’ve lived here since 2009 and there’s always another place to explore and another experience to discover.
And when you have the luxury of time, why make yourself rush by trying to do too much? Having no itinerary is far better than being a slave to a unforgiving schedule — it’s a holiday, after all.
Hi Tony,
My 10 year old daughter and husband and I are heading to Peru in a couple of months. We like the idea finding three or so different places we can put down routes for a week to ten days. I’m an artist, he surfs and our daughter is up for anything. But settling in places is more our jam than being on the perpetual go and seeing EVERYTHING. Any places come to mind? love your thoughts….Thanks a million and love reading and gleaning your insights.
Hi Claire. That’s a tough question, just because there are so many options. Cusco is an obvious choice as it’s an interesting city with lots do do nearby. Or you could stay in one of the towns in the Sacred Valley, outside of Cusco. I’d also recommend Northern Peru. The north coast is great for surfing with various small towns to choose from, so would be good for your husband. You could then head inland to Chachapoyas, which is great place with loads of things to do. And from there you could come to Tarapoto, where I live, which is a fun place with lots of waterfalls and things within easy reach of the city. I might be a bit biased because I live in the north and love Northern Peru because it’s less touristy and feels a bit more “unexplored,” but it’s definitely worth considering. Those are my first thoughts anyway. Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks, Tony.
Hi Tony – I am trying to plan my itinerary and was wondering if Cusco is a good home base to make trips to Pisac, Maras, Moray, and Ollantaytambo? After Cusco I was planning on taking the train to Aguas Calientes to spend the night before seeing Machu Picchu. I just wasn’t sure if that home base is a lot of back tracking.
Would it make more sense to split the time and do 2 nights in Cusco, 1-2 nights in Uruamba, and 1 night in AC instead? Loved your article, thank you!
Hi Lana. Cusco is fine as a base for exploring all those places. You can use the local buses to get around, and normally see three or four places in the Sacred Valley each day (more if you don’t hang around). But staying in Urubamba for a night or two is also a good option if you want to see somewhere other than Cusco. But then, there’s a lot to see and do in Cusco itself. What you could do is spend the first two nights in Cusco and then decide whether you want to move to Urubamba for a night or two, rather than planning it out in advance. Thanks, Tony.
Yeah, I must say that if we have any plan for Peru trip then we should make our trip more enjoyable with visiting all the spots in Peru and for that we should stay at least for 1 week in a suitable place so that we can easily travel some beautiful places in Peru. My friend suggested me that I need to contact Llanganuco Mountain Lodge in Peru which can help to make my Huaraz trip easier because I have a plan for interesting Peru tour for 2 weeks’ vacation next month.
I am going to the Galapagos first and then planning to go to Manchu Pichu and Cuzco. How many days do I need. I m not doing the extra Huanu Pichu trek or the 4 hour hike and planning to take a train only with minimal climbing. I am also debating the Amazon in Peru or Ecuador however given my aversion to insects and spiders am reconsidering this. I have been on an eco tour to Costa Rica. Not sure if this is similar.
Hi Margaret. If you just want to see Machu Picchu (without trekking) then you can basically do that in two days if you arrange things in advance (arrive in Cusco, head to Machu Picchu the next day, get back to Cusco the same night). But three to four days is best, and a few days more of you want to explore Cusco and other nearby attractions. It really depends how much time you can afford. Ideally five days in Cusco is great because there’s plenty to see and do. As for the Amazon, there will obviously be some similarities with the rainforest in Costa Rica, but it’s certainly worth doing the Amazon if you have time, and if you don’t mind a few spiders and insects for a few days. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Tony.
My husband and I are planning on spending a month in Peru (April/May 2019j. We are late 60s and early 70s and healthy TG! Heard differing opinions of # of days to spend around Lake Titicaca. What would your suggestion be and where? Thx.
Hi Bev. You’ll always hear mixed things about Lake Titicaca when you look online, because a lot of people go to Puno, do the incredibly touristy floating islands, and then leave right away with a negative impression. And that’s not surprising, especially considering that Puno isn’t the prettiest of places. But I love Lake Titicaca and could happily spend weeks down that way. Puno is fine as a base, but ideally you want to go explore the islands of Taquile and Amantani (I prefer Taquile) and maybe stay on one of them for a night or two. Then you can go see Sillustani and explore some villages like Llachon. Culturally, the whole region is really interesting, but you do need to go exploring a bit. So if that sounds like your kind of thing, and you don’t mind the high altitude, then 3 to 5 days would be reasonable, more if you want to go have a look at the Bolivian side, or have an extended stay on one of the islands. You can read more about Puno in my city guides section. Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks, Tony.
Hey Tony! You have written good stuff here! Thank you! I am planning for a trip to South America for the first time from Nov 1-Dec 25 tentatively. Essentially I would like to visit Peru, but I have also thought of going to Bolivia and Chile. Can you share some tips or advice? Basically my core interests lie in sightseeing/ hiking, food and cultures!
Hi Erwin. Having almost two months gives you plenty of flexibility, and you could definitely do all three countries. At the same time, there’s plenty to keep you busy for two months in Peru, especially if you did the north and the jungle. If you fly in to Lima you could head up the north coast of Peru and maybe inland to Chachapoyas (and potentially on to Tarapoto and the jungle), and then fly back to Lima before heading south to Cusco etc. Then to Puno/Lake Titicaca and cross over into Bolivia. Then you also have some options for getting back over into Chile. It kind of depends on how much you want to plan out your trip in advance. If you’re flexible with your plans and Peru is your main interest, then travel around and see how much time you spend there, keeping the southern destinations until last so you can easily head down to Chile or across to Bolivia afterwards. Personally, I’d go for Bolivia ahead of Chile (although Bolivian food isn’t great, Peru is best for that), but they are both interesting. Bolivia is just less modern and, in that respect, more interesting culturally, to some extent (no offense to Chile!). Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks, Tony.
Thanks a ton Tony!!
Thanks Tony for the info. I am planning a 9 day trip to Peru by the end of January 2019. Iwas wondering if it was too long but after reading your blog I decided stick to my 9 day trip and add Huacachina to my sites of interest. Basically want to do Lima, Huacachina and Cusco/MachuPichu. How would you recommen I organize my days. It is a family trip with 14yr old teenager and don’t think will do the trekking.
Thanks in advance for your advice.
Hi Irma. Sorry about the really late reply, I missed this comment somehow. Nine days is OK for doing Lima, Huacachina and Cusco/Machu Picchu, especially if you’re not hiking to MP. I guess two or maximum three days in Lima, then one day and night in Huacachina, and then spend the rest of your days in Cusco (with one day or one day and a night for Machu Picchu). That should be fine, and will give you time to explore the Sacred Valley and Cusco. Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks, Tony.
Irma, did you manage to make the trip last month? Was 9 days long enough? What did your itinerary look like?